The Battle for Wesnoth Forums

Victory, glorious victory! And with 74 gold left in the bank ;) Thanks for the replay, most informative and helpful. Nice job, clever defensive use of Delf's abilities I hadn't thought of... that alone would have made the entire scenario a lot easier! :doh: Also am I right in thinking you used Delf...

OK, played the Deceiver again and managed a slightly better finish in terms of Delf's xp. Convinced myself it was worth trying Ring of Swords again. Did 2 things differently; didn't help Garard and took more risks. Managed to to get through by the skin of my teeth, as this replay shows. Talk about a...

OK, replayed the previous scenario (The Deceiver) to try for a better start... and made things worse? Don't really understand why - the stats look OK but in this playthrough I felt under a lot more time pressure and Methor's ai made some odd moves. I had to save-load at the end when, running out of ...

Apologies for posting this here, but I wasn't able to find any feedback on TDG, apologies if I somehow missed the thread... Could some kind soul post a replay of htf to beat "Ring of swords" please? OK, I'm not the strongest of players but I should be able to beat the damn thing on easy bu...

papa

Smith

hermestrismi wrote: ↑May 10th, 2024, 11:03 pm you guys are just wizards. unfortunately, I didn't have time to test the suggestion...

Just as well, the latest version is about 1/3rd the size of the first attempt!

Good luck with your idea!

Cheers!
-- Spannerbag

Ravana wrote: ↑May 10th, 2024, 10:39 pm [filter] x,y=$x1,$y1 [/filter]

Is always passing, so you can just remove that.

Less is more so even better!
Must remember that, thanks.

Cheers!
-- Spannerbag

My only complaint about Spannerbag's code is that it only catches the default teleport ability and will not detect any custom teleport abilities that you define. A starting point for fixing this would be to use ability_type_active=teleport instead of ability_id_active=teleport . That's not sufficie...

bean

hermestrismi wrote: ↑May 8th, 2024, 3:55 pm Thank you very much.
this seems to be more logic and straight than my approach. I will test it as soon as possible and I will give you my result.

Glad to have been able to help!

Cheers!
-- Spannerbag

Hi, Your post intrigued me so I had a bit of a play, building on the suggestion by Ravana. This code isn't perfect, it might need [allow_undo] or maybe [cancel_action] but from my limited testing it does seem to trap teleports and filter out non-teleport movement. Anyway, it should at least give you...

lhybrideur wrote: ↑May 7th, 2024, 7:00 am The horrible way I did...

Yep, similar concept/logic.
Great minds...

Cheers!
-- Spannerbag

[fire_event] the [endlevel] call, but have the event containing [end_level] first_time_only=yes. Thanks for the reply, much appreciated! Heh, was just going to post to say I'd fixed it; as often happens right after posting, I had a bit of inspiration. Wish I had it before posting... :annoyed: The d...

Hi, I have a situation where a number of units may be [kill] ed simultaneously. [kill] [filter_location] find_in=fb [/filter_location] animate=yes fire_event=yes # Player loses if leader killed [primary_attack] type=fire [/primary_attack] [/kill] The scenario also has multiple leaders and if any lea...